Folia Parasitologica, vol. 60 (2013), issue 1

Folia Parasitologica 60[1] 51-60 (2013) | 10.14411/fp.2013.007

DNA-barcoding contradicts morphology in quill mite species Torotrogla merulae and T. rubeculi (Prostigmata: Syringophilidae)

Eliza Glowska, Anna Dragun-Damian, Jacek Dabert
Department of Animal Morphology, Faculty of Biology, A. Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61-614 Poznań, Poland

Torotrogla merulae Skoracki, Dabert et Ehrnsberger, 2000 and T. rubeculi Skoracki, 2004 have been considered as distinct steno- and monoxenous quill mite species (Acari: Prostigmata: Syringophilidae) parasitizing the thrushes of the genus Turdus Linnaeus and the European robin Erithacus rubecula (Linnaeus), respectively. Morphological and molecular studies on the taxonomical status of these two species provided contradictory results. Well defined differences in morphology were not supported by substantial genetic distance in nucleotide sequences of the DNA barcode (mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I, COI, and D2 domain of the nuclear 28S rRNA gene), by the topology of the phylogenetic trees (neighbor-joining, maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood) and the network analyses of the COI haplotype genealogy (median-joining, statistical parsimony) that reveal rubeculi populations nested within merulae haplotypes. Since detected differences between T. merulae and T. rubeculi populations (1.6-2.4% for COI and 0.1% for D2) are comparable to the intraspecific level observed in majority of currently recognized European Torotrogla species and are much lower than the interspecific distances observed in the genus, we postulate their conspecificity. Because main morphological distinctions concern the structures used for feeding, we hypothesize that they are the result of phenotypic plasticity evoked by specific and different environmental conditions prevailing on the host bodies (thickness of the feather quill wall).

Keywords: Acari, Torotrogla, COI, D2 28S rDNA, systematics, phenotypic plasticity

Received: August 23, 2012; Accepted: October 20, 2012; Published: February 14, 2013


References

  1. Badek A., Dabert M., Mironov S.V., Dabert J. 2008: New species of the genus Proctophyllodes (Analgoidea, Proctophyllodidae) from the cetti's warbler Cettia cetti (Passeriformes; Sylviidae) with DNA barcode data. Ann. Zool. 58: 397-402 Go to original source...
  2. Bandelt H.J., Forster P., Roehl A. 1999: Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16: 37-48 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Casto S.D. 1974a: Quill wall thickness and feeding of Syringophiloidus minor (Berlese) (Acarina: Syringophilidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 67: 824 Go to original source...
  4. Casto S.D. 1974b: Entry and exit of syringophilid mites (Acarina: Syringophilidae) from the lumen of the quill. Wilson Bull. 86: 272-278
  5. Casto S.D. 1974c: A nocturnal dispersal rhythm in the quill mite, Syringophiloidus minor (Berlese) (Prostigmata: Syringophilidae). J. Med. Entomol. 11: 113-114 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Casto S.D. 1975a: Generation time of male quill mites Syringophiloidus minor (Berlese) (Acarina: Syringophilidae). Am. Midl. Nat. 93: 495-498 Go to original source...
  7. Casto S.D. 1975b: The effect of the postjuvenal molt in the house sparrow on infestations of the quill mite, Syringophiloidus minor (Berlese) (Acarina: Syringophilidae). J. Med. Entomol. 12: 23-27 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Casto S.D. 1975c: Mortality in the quill mite, Syringophiloidus minor (Acarina: Syringophilidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 68: 551-552 Go to original source...
  9. Casto S.D. 1976: Host records and observations of quill mites (Acarina: Syringophilidae) from Texas birds. Southwest. Entomol. 1: 155-160
  10. Chen H., Strand M., Norenburg J.L., Shichun S., Kajihara H., Chernyshev A.V., Maslakova S.A., Sundberg P. 2010: Statistical parsimony networks and species assemblages in cephalotrichid nemerteans (Nemertea). PLoS One 5: e12885 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Clement M., Posada D., Crandall K.A. 2000: TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol. Ecol. 9: 1657-1660 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Dabert J., Ehrnsberger R., Dabert M. 2008: Glaucalges tytonis sp. n. (Analgoidea, Xolalgidae) from the barn owl Tyto alba (Strigiformes, Tytonidae): compiling morphology with DNA barcode data for taxon descriptions in mites (Acari). Zootaxa 1719: 41-52
  13. Dabert M., Witalinski W., Kazmierski A., Olszanowski Z., Dabert J. 2010: Molecular phylogeny of acariform mites (Acari, Arachnida): strong conflict between phylogenetic signal and long-branch attraction artifacts. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 56: 222-241 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Felsenstein J. 1985: Confidence limits on phylogenies: an ap proach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791 Go to original source...
  15. Glowska E., Dragun -Damian A., Dabert J. 2012a: Picobia dziabaszewskii sp. nov. (Acari, Syringophilidae) - combined description (morphology with DNA barcode data) of a new quill mite species parasitizing Garrulax formosus (Passeriformes: Leiothrichidae). Zootaxa 3224: 57-61
  16. Glowska E., Dragun -Damian A., Dabert J. 2012b: A new quill mite Syringophiloidus pseudonigritae sp. nov. (Prostigmata, Syringophilidae) parasitizing Pseudonigrita arnaudi (Passeriformes, Ploceidae) - a combined description using morphology and DNA barcode data. Zootaxa 3532: 64-68
  17. Harper J.T., Gile G.H., James E.R., Carpenter K.J., Keeling P.J. 2009: The inadequacy of morphology for species and genus delineation in microbial eukaryotes: an example from the parabasalian termite symbiont Coronympha. PLoS ONE 4: e677 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Hart M.W., Sunday J. 2007: Things fall apart: biological species form unconnected parsimony networks. Biol. Lett. 3: 509-512 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Hebert P.D.N., Penton E.H., Burns J.M., Janzen D.H., Hall wachs W. 2004: Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 14812-14817 Go to original source...
  20. Hebert P.D.N., Ratnasingham S., De Waard J.R. 2003: Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit I divergences among closely related species. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, Biol. Sci. 270 (Suppl.): 96-99 Go to original source...
  21. Huber S.K., De Leon L.F., Hendry A.P., Bermingham E., Podos J. 2007: Reproductive isolation of sympatric morphs in a population of Darwin's finches. Proc. Biol. Sci. 274: 1709-1714 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Johnson S.B., Waren A., Vrijenhoek R.C. 2008: DNA barcoding of Lepetodrilus limpets reveals cryptic species. J. Shellfish Res. 27: 43-51 Go to original source...
  23. Kethley J.B. 1970: A revision of the family Syringophilidae (Prostigmata: Acarina). Contrib. Am. Entomol. Inst. 6: 1-76.
  24. Kethley J.B. 1971: Population regulation in quill mites (Acari: Syringophilidae). Ecology 52: 1113-1118 Go to original source...
  25. Kethley J.B., Johnston D.E. 1975: Resource tracking patterns in bird and mammal ectoparasites. Misc. Publ. Entomol. Soc. Am. 9: 227-236
  26. Kimura M. 1980: A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16: 111-120 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Kiontke K., Fitch D.H.A. 2010: Phenotypic plasticity: different teeth for different feasts. Curr. Biol. 20: R710-R712 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Lohse J., Rinder H., Gothe R., Zahler M. 2002: Validity of species status of the parasitic mite Otodectes cynotis. Med. Vet. Entomol. 16: 133-138 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Lumley L.M., Sperling A.H. 2010: Integrating morphology and mitochondrial DNA for species delimitation within the spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana) cryptic species complex (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Syst. Entomol. 35: 416-428 Go to original source...
  30. Martin P., Dabert M., Dabert J. 2010: Molecular evidence for species separation in the water mite Hygrobates nigromaculatus Lebert, 1879 (Acari, Hydrachnidia): evolutionary consequences of the loss of larval parasitism. Aquat. Sci. 72: 347-360 Go to original source...
  31. Mironov S.V., Dabert J., Dabert M. 2012: A new feather mite species of the genus Proctophyllodes Robin, 1877 (Astigmata, Proctophyllodidae) from the long-tailed tit Aegithalos caudatus (Passeriformes: Aegithalidae) - morphological description with DNA barcode data. Zootaxa 3253: 54-61
  32. Muschick M., Barluenga M., Salzburger W., Meyer A. 2011: Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in the Midas cichlid fish pharyngeal jaw and its relevance in adaptive radiation. BMC Evol. Biol. 11: 116 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Nicholas K.B., Nicholas H.B. Jr. 1997: GeneDoc: a tool for editing and annotating multiple sequence alignments. Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center's National Resource for Biomedical Supercomputing, ver. 2.7.000. http://www.nrbsc.org/downloads (accessed 2 March 2007)
  34. van Niekerk J.M., Crous P.W., Groenewald J.Z., Fourie P.H., Halleen F. 2004: DNA phylogeny, morphology and pathogenicity of Botryosphaeria species on grapevines. Mycologia 96: 781-798 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Otranto D., Milillo P., Traversa D., Colwell D.D. 2005: Morphological variability and genetic identity in Rhinoestrus spp. causing horse nasal myiasis. Med. Vet. Entomol. 19: 96- 100 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  36. Otsuka S., Suda S., Li R., Watanabe M., Oyaizu H., Matsumoto S., Watanabe M.M. 1999: Phylogenetic relationships between toxic and non-toxic strains of the genus Microcystis based on 16S to 23S internal transcribed spacer sequence. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 172: 15-21 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  37. Pegler K.R., Evans L., Stevens J.R., Wall R. 2005: Morphological and molecular comparison of host-derived populations of parasitic Psoroptes mites. Med. Vet. Entomol. 19: 392-403 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  38. Polzin T., Daneschmand S.V. 2003: On Steiner trees and minimum spanning trees in hypergraphs. Oper. Res. Lett. 31: 12-20 Go to original source...
  39. Posada D. 2008: ModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25: 1253-1256 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  40. Sbordoni V. 2010: Strength and limitations of DNA barcode under the multidimensional species perspective. In: P.L. Nimis and R. V. Lebbe (Eds.), Tools for Identifying Biodiversity: Progress and Problems. Proceedings of the International Congress, Paris, 20-22 September 2010, EUT Edizioni, Universita di Trieste, pp. 275-280 Go to PubMed...
  41. Skoracka A. 2008: Reproductive barriers between populations of the cereal rust mite Abacarus hystrix confirm their host specialization. Evol. Ecol. 22: 607-616 Go to original source...
  42. Skoracka A. 2009: Description of Abacarus lolii n. sp. (Prostigmata: Eriophyoidea: Eriophyidae), a cryptic species within a grass-feeding Abacarus complex. Int. J. Acarol. 35: 405-417 Go to original source...
  43. Skoracka A., Dabert M. 2010: The cereal rust mite Abacarus hystrix (Acari: Eriophyoidea) is a complex of species: evidence from mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Bull. Entomol. Res. 100: 263-272 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  44. Skoracki M., Michalik J., Sikora B. 2010: Prevalence and habitat preference of quill mites (Acari, Syringophilidae) parasitizing forest passerine birds in Poland. Acta Parasitol. 55: 188-193 Go to original source...
  45. Sonnenberg R., Nolte A.W., Tautz D. 2007: An evaluation of LSU rDNA D1-D2 sequences for their use in species identification. Front. Zool. 4: 6 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  46. Sperling F.A. 2003: DNA Barcoding: Deus ex Machina. Newsletter Biol. Surv. Canada (Terrestrial Arthropods) 22: 50-53
  47. Swofford D.L. 2002: PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA Go to PubMed...
  48. Tamura K., Dudley J., Nei M., Kumar S. 2007: MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 1596-1599 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  49. Tautz D., Arctander P., Minelli A., Thomas R.H., Vogler A.P. 2003: A plea for DNA taxonomy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 70-74 Go to original source...
  50. Templeton A.R., Crandall K.A., Sing C.F. 1992: A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132: 619-633 Go to PubMed...
  51. Vrijenhoek R.C. 2009: Cryptic species, phenotypic plasticity, and complex life histories: assessing deep-sea faunal diversity with molecular markers. Deep-Sea Res. (2 Top. Stud. Oceanogr.) 56: 1713-1723 Go to original source...
  52. Will K.W., Rubinoff D. 2004: Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and classification. Cladistics 20: 47-55 Go to original source...
  53. Wilson J.J., Landry J.-F., Janzen D.H., Hallwachs W., Nazari V., Hajibabaei M., Hebert P.D.N. 2010: Identity of the ailanthus webworm moth (Lepidoptera, Yponomeutidae), a complex of two species: evidence from DNA barcoding, morphology and ecology. ZooKeys 46: 41-60 Go to original source...
  54. Zwickl D.J. 2006: Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, 115 pp