Folia Parasitologica, vol. 61 (2014), issue 2

Folia Parasitologica 61[2] 141-147 (2014) | 10.14411/fp.2014.015

Redescription and systematic position of Soricinia tripartita »arnowski, 1955 (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea), a cestode species parasitic in shrews of the genus Sorex, including erection of Gulyaevilepis gen. n.

Svetlana A. Kornienko1, Rasa Binkienė2
1 Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia;
2 Institute of Ecology, Nature Research Centre, Vilnius Lithuania

Soricinia tripartita »arnowski, 1955 is redescribed on the basis of specimens from the type host Sorex araneus Linnaeus from Lithuania, Latvia and Russia (Republic of Karelia and Republic of Komi - a new geographical record) as well as from Sorex satunini Ognev and Sorex volnuchini Ognev from Russia (Nalchik Area in the Caucasus Mountains). The strobilar morphology of S. tripartita is compared with that of other hymenolepidid cestodes of shrews with an unarmed scolex and serial development of proglottides in the strobila, i.e. species of Mathevolepis Spassky, 1948, Ditestolepis Soltys, 1952, Spasskylepis Schaldybin, 1964, Ecrinolepis Spassky et Karpenko, 1983 and Diorchilepis Lykova, Gulyaev, Melnikova et Karpenko, 2006. It was noted that S. tripartita does not correspond to any of the known genera. The following unique characters are found for S. tripartita: heteronomous serial strobilation with one or two sterile proglottides at the end of each series in the strobila and the whole copulatory part of the vagina covered with numerous, fine spines. Therefore, the new genus Gulyaevilepis is erected, with Gulyaevilepis tripartita (»arnowski, 1955) comb. n. as its type and only species. Since the type material of Soricinia tripartita is not known to exist, a neotype from the same host species and from a locality close to the type locality is designated.

Keywords: morphology, taxonomy, Hymenolepididae, tapeworms, new genus, neotype, insectivores, Europe

Received: May 27, 2013; Accepted: November 5, 2013; Prepublished online: January 10, 2014; Published: April 14, 2014


References

  1. Binkiene R., Kontrimavichus V., Hoberg E. 2011: Overview of the cestode fauna of European shrews of the genus Sorex with comments on the fauna in Neomys and Crocidura and an exploration of historical processes in post-glacial Europe. Helminthologia 48: 207-228 Go to original source...
  2. Czaplinski B., Vaucher C. 1994: Family Hymenolepididae Ariola, 1899. In: L.F. Khalil, A. Jones and R.A. Bray (Eds.), Keys to the Cestode Parasites of Vertebrates. CAB International, Wallingford, pp. 595-663
  3. Genov T. 1984: [Helminths of Insectivorous and Rodents in Bulgaria.] Publishing House of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, 348 pp. (In Bulgarian.)
  4. Gulyaev V.D. 1991: [Morphology and taxonomy of Ditestolepidini - cestodes (Cyclophyllidea) of shrews with the serialmetameric structure of the strobila.] Zool. Zh. 70: 44-53. (In Russian.)
  5. Gulyaev V.D., Karpenko S.V. 1998: [Cestodes of the genus Mathevolepis (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea, Hymenolepididae) from the common shrews of the Holarctic region.] Parazitologiya 32: 507-518. (In Russian.)
  6. Gulyaev V.D., Lykova K.A., Mel'nikova Yu.A., Bibik E.V. 2004: [Validity of species Spasskylepis ovaluteri (Cestoda, Cyclophyllidea, Hymenolepididae) - parasite of shrews from Palearctic.] Zool. Zh. 83: 387-394. (In Russian.)
  7. Haukisalmi V., Hardman L.M., Foronda P., Feliu C., Laakkonen J., Niemimaa J., Lehtonen J.T., Henttonen H. 2010: Systematic relationships of hymenolepidid cestodes of rodents and shrews inferred from sequences of 28S ribosomal RNA. Zool. Scr. 39: 631-641 Go to original source...
  8. Kornienko S.A. 2001: [Cestodes of shrews from North-Eastern Altai (taxonomy, systematic and ecology).] PhD thesis, Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Science, Novosibirsk, 23 pp. (In Russian.)
  9. Lykova K.A., Gulyaev V.D., Mel'nikova Yu.A., Karpenko S.V. 2006: [Diorchilepis is new genus of cestodes (Cyclophyllidea, Hymenolepididae, Ditestolepidini) and redescription of Diorchilepis ezoensis comb. n. from shrews of Sakhalin Island and the Kuril Islands.] Zool. Zh. 85: 1506-1510. (In Russian.)
  10. Mas-Coma S., Puchades M.T. 1991: A methodology for the morphoanatomic and systematic study of the species of the family Hymenolepididae Railliet et Henry, 1909 (Cestoda: Cyclophyllidea). Res. Rev. Parasitol. 51: 139-173
  11. Mel'nikova Yu.A., Lykova K.A., Gulyaev V.D. 2004: [Ecrinolepis kontrimavichusi sp. n. (Cyclophyllidea, Hymenolepididae) is a new cestode in shrews from the Far East southern Primorye.] Zool. Zh. 83: 1275-1279. (In Russian.)
  12. Mel'nikova Yu.A., Lykova K.A., Gulyaev V.D. 2005: [Ecrinolepis orientales sp. n. (Cyclophyllidea, Hymenolepididae), a new species of cestodes from shrews of southern Primorye.]Zool. Zh. 84: 746-749. (In Russian.)
  13. Rybicka K. 1959: Tapeworms of forest micromammalians (Rodentia and insectivores) from Kampinos Wilderness. Acta Parasitol. Pol. 7: 46-55
  14. Spassky A.A. 1954: [Classification of hymenolepidids of mammals]. Trudy GELAN 7: 120-167. (In Russian.)
  15. Vaucher C. 1971: Les cestodes parasites des Soricidae d'Europe. Etude anatomique revision taxonomique et biologie. Rev. Suisse Zool. 78: 1-113 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Zarnowski E. 1955: [Parasitic worms of forest micromammalians (Rodentia and Insectivora) of the enviroment of Pulawy (district Lublin). 1. Cestoda.] Acta Parasitol. Pol. 3: 279-368. (In Polish.)
  17. Zarnowski E. 1955: [Parasitic worms of forest micromammalians (Rodentia and Insectivora) of the enviroment of Pulawy (district Lublin). 1. Cestoda.] Acta Parasitol. Pol. 3: 279-368. (In Polish.)